The KTM 160 Duke finds itself in the same segment as the Yamaha MT-15. Here’s how the newest Austrian streetfighter compares with its Japanese rival on paper.
KTM 160 Duke vs Yamaha MT-15: Engine and output
| Engine and output | ||
|---|---|---|
| KTM 160 Duke | Yamaha MT-15 | |
| Engine | 164.2cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled | 155cc, single-cylinder, liquid-cooled |
| Power | 19hp at 9,500rpm | 18.4hp at 10,000rpm |
| Torque | 15.5Nm at 7,500rpm | 14.1Nm at 7,500rpm |
| Gearbox | 6-speed | 6-speed |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 129.2hp/tonne | 130.4hp/tonne |
Despite higher peak output, the 160 Duke has a lower power-to-weight ratio
The KTM’s slightly larger-displacement engine produces 0.6hp and 1.4Nm more than the Yamaha, but the MT-15 still edges ahead thanks to its superior power-to-weight ratio. This is despite KTM’s claim that the 160 Duke has one of the best ratios in its class. In reality, the MT-15 fares better on this count. Powering it is the same 155cc engine found in the R15 – a motorcycle that has earned a cult following in our market – while the 160 Duke’s engine is derived from the 200 Duke.
KTM 160 Duke vs Yamaha MT-15: Weight and dimensions
| Weight and dimensions | ||
|---|---|---|
| KTM 160 Duke | Yamaha MT-15 | |
| Kerb weight | 147kg | 141kg |
| Seat height | 815mm | 810mm |
| Ground clearance | 174mm | 170mm |
| Fuel tank capacity | 10.1 litres | 10 litres |
| Wheelbase | 1357mm | 1325mm |
The MT-15 is 6kg lighter
The KTM 160 Duke is noticeably heavier than the MT-15, which offsets its power advantage and results in a lower power-to-weight ratio. Despite the weight difference, the fuel tank capacity is similar, at around 10 litres. While that figure isn’t particularly impressive, the MT-15’s lighter build means it maintains practicality without compromising on fuel range. Seat height on both bikes is accessible, with only a marginal difference between them.
KTM 160 Duke vs Yamaha MT-15: Suspension, brakes and tyres
| Suspension, brakes and tyres | ||
|---|---|---|
| KTM 160 Duke | Yamaha MT-15 | |
| Suspension | USD fork / monoshock | USD fork / monoshock |
| Brakes | 320mm disc / 230mm disc | 282mm disc / 220mm disc |
| Tyres | 110/70-17 / 140/60-R17 | 100/80-17 / 140/70R-17 |
Both motorcycles feature a USD fork and monoshock
Both motorcycles fall in the premium 150-160cc category, and it’s fitting given that they feature top-drawer hardware, including a USD fork and a monoshock. Both use a 140-section rear radial tyre, but the KTM gets a slightly wider 110-section front. Interestingly, the erstwhile 125 Duke featured a 150-section rear, whereas this new, more powerful KTM makes do with a 140-section rubber. The KTM 160 Duke also sports a much larger front rotor compared to the MT-15; that said, the MT-15’s disc offers adequate progression and bite.
KTM 160 Duke vs Yamaha MT-15: Features
The MT-15 features a 4.2-inch TFT dash
The MT-15 is available in a top-spec DLX variant that introduces a 4.2-inch TFT dash to the range. This unit, borrowed from the FZ-S Fi Hybrid, features app-based functionality. The 160 Duke is also offered in a higher-spec variant that borrows the TFT dash from the 390 Duke. Meanwhile, the base variant comes with an LCD dash with Bluetooth connectivity. Both bikes get all-LED lighting, though the MT-15 edges ahead with its projector LED setup. Dual-channel ABS is standard on both, and in typical KTM fashion, the rear unit can be switched off in Supermoto mode.
KTM 160 Duke vs Yamaha MT-15: Price
| Price | ||
|---|---|---|
| KTM 160 Duke | Yamaha MT-15 | |
| Price | Rs 1.71 – 1.79 lakh | Rs 1.58 – 1.68 lakh |
The MT-15 is offered in STD and DLX variants
The Duke 160 is available in two variants: the base variant and the TFT model, with no other differences besides their instrument clusters. The Yamaha MT-15 also comes in two variants: STD and DLX. Again, the difference is based on the features offered, with the STD variant having an LCD dash and the DLX variant offering a TFT dash. The MT-15 also comes in a wider range of colours, but they are bundled along with the variants.
Also see:


