5 min readNew DelhiAug 12, 2026 03:00 PM IST
Every day, people come into contact with a wide range of synthetic chemicals through food packaging, plastic containers, non-stick cookware, stain-resistant fabrics and even drinking water. Among the most discussed are endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) such as bisphenol A (BPA), certain phthalates and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which have been studied for their ability to interfere with the body’s hormone signalling. As research into these chemicals grows, there is increasing interest in whether long-term, low-level exposure could influence not just reproductive health but also metabolism and blood sugar regulation.
DISCLAIMER: This article is based on information from the public domain and/or the experts we spoke to. Always consult your health practitioner before starting any routine.
While genetics, diet, physical activity and body weight remain the major drivers of blood sugar control and diabetes risk, scientists are investigating whether environmental exposures may also play a supporting role. Some studies have suggested possible links between endocrine-disrupting chemicals and insulin resistance, impaired glucose metabolism or a higher risk of type 2 diabetes, but the evidence is still evolving and many questions remain about causation, real-world exposure levels and who may be most vulnerable. An expert can help explain what current research shows, how significant these risks may be and what practical steps people can take without unnecessary alarm.
What science says about endocrine-disrupting chemicals and diabetes risk
Jeanne Riberio – Head Nutritionist and Diabetes Expert at Nutrition In Sync, tells indianexpress.com, “Clients ask this a lot, and it deserves an honest answer rather than a scary headline. The evidence points to a real association, but its strength depends on the chemical.”
“BPA has the most consistent record,” notes Riberio, adding that a nine-year French study of 755 people “found higher BPA exposure tracked with type 2 diabetes even after other risk factors were accounted for, and pooled data suggest roughly a 45% increase in risk. Phthalates follow close behind; a meta-analysis of more than 12,000 people tied them to higher diabetes risk and insulin resistance, though the signal is a little softer.”
PFAS is the genuinely unsettled one. “A 2025 Mount Sinai study saw about a 31% higher risk as exposure rose, yet other prospective studies disagree. Part of the difficulty is reverse causation: once diabetes develops, diet and metabolism shift, and that can alter chemical levels in the blood, muddying cause and effect,” shares Riberio.
She adds that the concern is “legitimate – strongest for BPA, moderate for phthalates, mixed for PFAS, but it sits below diet, weight, and inactivity as a driver.”
Story continues below this ad
How these chemicals may affect blood sugar regulation
These chemicals disturb blood sugar control through a few routes. Riberio informs, “Some act directly on the pancreas – BPA, for example, disrupts the beta-cells that produce insulin, and at higher doses can damage them outright. Others imitate real hormones: BPA behaves like estrogen, and several compounds interfere with thyroid and PPARγ signaling, the pathways governing how the body stores fat and responds to insulin. And since everyday exposure comes as a mixture, the combined effect tends to be larger than any single chemical alone.”
As for vulnerability, Riberio says, pregnancy is the clearest concern. Expectant mothers naturally become more insulin-resistant, and their beta-cells expand using the very estrogen signalling these chemicals disrupt, and the compounds cross the placenta, potentially shaping the baby’s metabolism for years ahead. Children carry similar risk, since early exposure appears to raise adult diabetes odds, though that evidence is thinner.
“For someone with prediabetes, caution makes sense – their beta-cells and insulin sensitivity are already under strain, with less reserve to spare, even if that remains reasonable inference rather than Put simply, if you’re pregnant, raising young children, or already living with prediabetes, you’re in the group most worth taking sensible precautions, since these are the bodies with the least room to absorb an extra hit,” explains the expert.
Practical ways to reduce exposure without unnecessary worry
Quick Quiz
See if you can answer this:
Story continues below this ad
Which habit is most strongly supported by evidence for reducing exposure to BPA and similar chemicals?
A. Drinking detox teas to flush the chemicals out of the body.
B. Heating leftovers in plastic containers labelled “BPA-free”.
C. Choosing fresh or frozen foods over heavily packaged options and avoiding heating food in plastic containers.
D. Avoiding all packaged foods for the rest of your life.
Reveal the answer
✅ Correct answer: C
Story continues below this ad
Riberio reveals, “Research suggests that choosing fresh or frozen foods instead of heavily packaged or canned options and avoiding heating food in plastic containers are among the most effective ways to reduce BPA and phthalate exposure. Detox teas and supplements have not been shown to remove these chemicals, and “BPA-free” plastics may still contain similar compounds. These changes can be a helpful addition to an overall healthy lifestyle, but diet, exercise and maintaining a healthy weight remain the most important factors for long-term metabolic health.”
DISCLAIMER: This article is based on information from the public domain and/or the experts we spoke to. Always consult your health practitioner before starting any routine.


